Best Golf Rangefinders For Shooting:
Bushnell Rangemaster II
The Bushnell Rangemaster II is one of the most popular rangefinders among professional golfers because it provides accurate distance measurements with great precision. The Rangemaster II’s optical system features two separate lenses that are focused separately from each other, allowing for precise measurement of distance accurately up to 1/2 mile (1 km). The Rangemaster II’s optical system uses a laser beam to measure distance, which allows for extremely high precision.
Pros Cons Excellent range and accuracy
Large viewing window
Laser beam technology makes it very accurate Distance measurements up to 1/2 mile (1 km) Accuracy is good at distances less than 5 yards (4 m), but becomes problematic at longer ranges. Accuracy is poor when measuring distances greater than 10 yards (6 m).
Relatively heavy and bulky
Limited field of view Great price range: $300-$500 Price range is similar to the Sony ICF-SW100 Digital Camera.
Sony ICF-SW100 Digital Camera Pros Cons Very large image sensor (3.0 MP) Large size and weight (12 oz / 340 g) Limited field of view No built-in flash or Wi-Fi connectivity Limited battery life Battery life lasts only 2 hours on full charge, compared to 3.5 hours on the Rangemaster II. Excellent energy efficiency: takes 6 AAs, at most, compared to Rangemaster’s 8 AAs. Price range is similar to the Strobe Systems Spartan-IIS.
Strobe Systems (G2) Pros Cons Durable and water resistant Not as durable or water resistance as the Rangemaster II or the Spartan-IIs. Very lightweight (8.5 oz / 241 g). Very large field of view. (1/2 mile / 2 km range) limited, but can be corrected by removing the digitiser from the main device.
Incredibly fast measurements: Range is out in 0.2 seconds. For better accuracy, remove the digitiser for a more narrow width of view. Large price range: $500-$900 Price range is similar to that of the Rangemaster II and the Strobe Systems (G1).
Can’t Miss Deals On Rangefinders:
All of these devices are excellent choices. You should choose the model that best fits your needs. Before you buy a rangefinder, remember to look at the specifications and reviews online to find out which product is right for you. You can also post a question in the forum or contact us directly.
Hopefully, this guide has provided you with all of the information that you need to choose and buy the best rangefinder for your unique needs. Whether or not you are a professional golfer or a hunter, the right rangefinder can make your experience much more efficient and fun.
Disclosure: Some of the links in this article are “affiliate links.” This means if you click on the link and purchase the item, we will receive an affiliate commission. Regardless, we only recommend products or services we believe will add value to our readers.
Sources & references used in this article:
Laser rangefinders by PA Forrester, KF Hulme – Optical and Quantum Electronics, 1981 – Springer
High-speed feature extraction in sensor coordinates for laser rangefinders by A Alempijevic – Australasian Conference on Robotics and …, 2004 – opus.lib.uts.edu.au
Sensor fusion of monocular cameras and laser rangefinders for line-based simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) tasks in autonomous mobile robots by X Zhang, AB Rad, YK Wong – Sensors, 2012 – mdpi.com
Simulation-based comparison of 2D scan matching algorithms for different rangefinders by Q Li, F Müller, A Wenzel… – 2016 21st International …, 2016 – ieeexplore.ieee.org
Sparse representation based acoustic rangefinders: from sensor platforms to mobile devices by P Misra, SS Kanhere, S Jha… – IEEE Communications …, 2015 – ieeexplore.ieee.org
Towards lighting-invariant visual navigation: An appearance-based approach using scanning laser-rangefinders by C McManus, P Furgale, TD Barfoot – Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2013 – Elsevier
Extrinsic calibration of 2D laser rangefinders from perpendicular plane observations by E Fernández-Moral… – … Journal of Robotics …, 2015 – journals.sagepub.com
Extrinsic calibration of 2d laser rangefinders based on a mobile sphere by S Chen, J Liu, T Wu, W Huang, K Liu, D Yin, X Liang… – Remote Sensing, 2018 – mdpi.com